KRUS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brinker International has a net margin of -1.49% compared to Kura Sushi USA's net margin of 3.38%. Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -4.36% beat Brinker International's return on equity of --.

Kura Sushi USA has a consensus price target of $110.63, signalling upside risk potential of 22.79%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $124.31 which suggests that it could fall by -10.9%. Given that Kura Sushi USA has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Kura Sushi USA is more attractive than Brinker International.

Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.841, which suggesting that the stock is 84.106% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 2.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 152.255%.

Kura Sushi USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kura Sushi USA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are smaller than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$961K is lower than Brinker International's net income of $38.5M. Notably, Kura Sushi USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 732.14x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 34.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kura Sushi USA is 4.05x versus 1.41x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

El Pollo Loco Holdings has a net margin of -1.49% compared to Kura Sushi USA's net margin of 5.14%. Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -4.36% beat El Pollo Loco Holdings's return on equity of 9.49%.

Kura Sushi USA has a consensus price target of $110.63, signalling upside risk potential of 22.79%. On the other hand El Pollo Loco Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.67%. Given that El Pollo Loco Holdings has higher upside potential than Kura Sushi USA, analysts believe El Pollo Loco Holdings is more attractive than Kura Sushi USA.

Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.841, which suggesting that the stock is 84.106% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison El Pollo Loco Holdings has a beta of 1.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.76%.

Kura Sushi USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. El Pollo Loco Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kura Sushi USA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. El Pollo Loco Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are smaller than El Pollo Loco Holdings quarterly revenues of $120.4M. Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$961K is lower than El Pollo Loco Holdings's net income of $6.2M. Notably, Kura Sushi USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 732.14x while El Pollo Loco Holdings's PE ratio is 14.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kura Sushi USA is 4.05x versus 0.73x for El Pollo Loco Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a net margin of -1.49% compared to Kura Sushi USA's net margin of -6.87%. Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -4.36% beat Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's return on equity of --.

Kura Sushi USA has a consensus price target of $110.63, signalling upside risk potential of 22.79%. On the other hand Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 64.47%. Given that Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has higher upside potential than Kura Sushi USA, analysts believe Red Robin Gourmet Burgers is more attractive than Kura Sushi USA.

Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.841, which suggesting that the stock is 84.106% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Robin Gourmet Burgers has a beta of 2.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.109%.

Kura Sushi USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kura Sushi USA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are smaller than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers quarterly revenues of $274.6M. Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$961K is higher than Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's net income of -$18.9M. Notably, Kura Sushi USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 732.14x while Red Robin Gourmet Burgers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kura Sushi USA is 4.05x versus 0.07x for Red Robin Gourmet Burgers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sweetgreen has a net margin of -1.49% compared to Kura Sushi USA's net margin of -12%. Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -4.36% beat Sweetgreen's return on equity of -18.6%.

Kura Sushi USA has a consensus price target of $110.63, signalling upside risk potential of 22.79%. On the other hand Sweetgreen has an analysts' consensus of $41.20 which suggests that it could grow by 27.83%. Given that Sweetgreen has higher upside potential than Kura Sushi USA, analysts believe Sweetgreen is more attractive than Kura Sushi USA.

Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.841, which suggesting that the stock is 84.106% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sweetgreen has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kura Sushi USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sweetgreen offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kura Sushi USA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sweetgreen pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues are $64.5M, which are smaller than Sweetgreen quarterly revenues of $173.4M. Kura Sushi USA's net income of -$961K is higher than Sweetgreen's net income of -$20.8M. Notably, Kura Sushi USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 732.14x while Sweetgreen's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kura Sushi USA is 4.05x versus 5.46x for Sweetgreen. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.